[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110531185122.GA11998@srcf.ucam.org>
Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 19:51:22 +0100
From: Matthew Garrett <mjg@...hat.com>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: Dan Rosenberg <drosenberg@...curity.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kees.cook@...onical.com, davej@...hat.com,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, adobriyan@...il.com,
eranian@...gle.com, penberg@...nel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
pageexec@...email.hu, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] Randomize kernel base address on boot
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 11:40:13AM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 05/31/2011 09:52 AM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > The BIOS E820 map, or the kernel representation? In either case, this
> > isn't going to work well with EFI. There are regions that will be marked
> > as available in the E820 map that we *mustn't* touch until we've entered
> > EFI virtual mode.
> >
> > (This is, clearly, insane).
> >
>
> I believe we could (should!) mark them reserved, not available, in the
> E820 map and free them later.
That was my original approach, but it requires that the bootloader be
modified and it turns out that it's a lot harder to hand reserved
regions back to the OS than it is to just reserve it in-kernel. The
complete inflexibility of e820 is massively unhelpful here. It's just
not possible to represent all of the EFI memory map data in it.
--
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@...f.ucam.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists