[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110531040444.GA1745@linux-sh.org>
Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 13:04:44 +0900
From: Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>
To: Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, johnstul@...ibm.com,
linux-sh@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clocksource: sh_tmu: Runtime PM support
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 05:30:06PM +0900, Paul Mundt wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 10:40:26PM +0900, Magnus Damm wrote:
> > From: Magnus Damm <damm@...nsource.se>
> >
> > Add Runtime PM support to the TMU driver.
> >
[snip]
> >
> > + /* wake up device and enable clock */
> > + pm_runtime_get_sync(&p->pdev->dev);
> > ret = clk_enable(p->clk);
> > if (ret) {
> > dev_err(&p->pdev->dev, "cannot enable clock\n");
> > + pm_runtime_put_sync(&p->pdev->dev);
> > return ret;
> > }
> >
> At this point the spinlock hasn't been initialized yet, so any of the
> pm_runtime calls are pretty much unsafe. We could manually test
> pm_runtime_enabled() before any of the get/put_sync() calls, but that gets to
> be a bit ugly.
Note that I will be reverting these patches for -rc2 if no progress is
made here. This is a fundamental ordering issue with regards to locking,
and is completely bogus for every SMP platform we have.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists