[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4DE46F69.4000205@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 13:32:41 +0900
From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
To: caiqian@...hat.com
CC: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, rientjes@...gle.com, hughd@...gle.com,
kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com, minchan.kim@...il.com,
oleg@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] Fix oom killer doesn't work at all if system have
> gigabytes memory (aka CAI founded issue)
(2011/05/31 13:10), KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> (2011/05/31 10:33), CAI Qian wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Have tested those patches rebased from KOSAKI for the latest mainline.
>> It still killed random processes and recevied a panic at the end by
>> using root user. The full oom output can be found here.
>> http://people.redhat.com/qcai/oom
>
> You ran fork-bomb as root. Therefore unprivileged process was killed at first.
> It's no random. It's intentional and desirable. I mean
>
> - If you run the same progream as non-root, python will be killed at first.
> Because it consume a lot of memory than daemons.
> - If you run the same program as root, non root process and privilege explicit
> dropping processes (e.g. irqbalance) will be killed at first.
I mean, oom-killer start to kill python after killing all unprivilege process
in this case. Please wait & see ahile after sequence.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists