linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/14] tmpfs: add shmem_read_mapping_page

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20110601004225.GC4433@infradead.org>
Date:	Tue, 31 May 2011 20:42:25 -0400
From:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To:	Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/14] tmpfs: add shmem_read_mapping_page_gfp

> (shmem_read_mapping_page_gfp or shmem_read_cache_page_gfp?  Generally
> the read_mapping_page functions use the mapping's ->readpage, and the
> read_cache_page functions use the supplied filler, so I think
> read_cache_page_gfp was slightly misnamed.)

What about just shmem_read_page?  It's not using the pagecache, so
no need for the mapping or cache, and the _gfp really is just a hack
because the old pagecache APIs didn't allow to pass the gfp flags.
For a new API there's no need for that.

> +static inline struct page *shmem_read_mapping_page(
> +				struct address_space *mapping, pgoff_t index)
> +{
> +	return shmem_read_mapping_page_gfp(mapping, index,
> +				mapping_gfp_mask(mapping));
> +}

This really shouldn't be in pagemap.h.  For now probably in shmem_fs.h

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/