linux-kernel - [144/165] atm: expose ATM device index in sysfs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20110601081217.404636424@blue.kroah.org>
Date:	Wed, 01 Jun 2011 17:11:54 +0900
From:	Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...nel.org
Cc:	stable-review@...nel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
	Dan Williams <dcbw@...hat.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>
Subject: [144/165] atm: expose ATM device index in sysfs

2.6.39-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let us know.

------------------
Content-Length: 1808
Lines: 53

From: Dan Williams <dcbw@...hat.com>

commit e7a46b4d0839c2a3aa2e0ae0b145f293f6738498 upstream.

It's currently exposed only through /proc which, besides requiring
screen-scraping, doesn't allow userspace to distinguish between two
identical ATM adapters with different ATM indexes.  The ATM device index
is required when using PPPoATM on a system with multiple ATM adapters.

Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dcbw@...hat.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Tested-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>

---
 net/atm/atm_sysfs.c |   10 ++++++++++
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)

--- a/net/atm/atm_sysfs.c
+++ b/net/atm/atm_sysfs.c
@@ -59,6 +59,14 @@ static ssize_t show_atmaddress(struct de
 	return pos - buf;
 }
 
+static ssize_t show_atmindex(struct device *cdev,
+			     struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
+{
+	struct atm_dev *adev = to_atm_dev(cdev);
+
+	return sprintf(buf, "%d\n", adev->number);
+}
+
 static ssize_t show_carrier(struct device *cdev,
 			    struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
 {
@@ -99,6 +107,7 @@ static ssize_t show_link_rate(struct dev
 
 static DEVICE_ATTR(address, S_IRUGO, show_address, NULL);
 static DEVICE_ATTR(atmaddress, S_IRUGO, show_atmaddress, NULL);
+static DEVICE_ATTR(atmindex, S_IRUGO, show_atmindex, NULL);
 static DEVICE_ATTR(carrier, S_IRUGO, show_carrier, NULL);
 static DEVICE_ATTR(type, S_IRUGO, show_type, NULL);
 static DEVICE_ATTR(link_rate, S_IRUGO, show_link_rate, NULL);
@@ -106,6 +115,7 @@ static DEVICE_ATTR(link_rate, S_IRUGO, s
 static struct device_attribute *atm_attrs[] = {
 	&dev_attr_atmaddress,
 	&dev_attr_address,
+	&dev_attr_atmindex,
 	&dev_attr_carrier,
 	&dev_attr_type,
 	&dev_attr_link_rate,


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/