[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BANLkTimAOWNJNGJwJkCkwwDJ2BR__NCV+A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 10:37:16 +0200
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Mattias Wallin <mattias.wallin@...ricsson.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] clocksource: add DB8500 PRCMU Timer support
2011/6/1 Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>:
> On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 11:18:25PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
>> Keeping it under include/linux is probably wise since we want drivers
>> OUT of the ARM tree, but I don't know if there is much consensus on that?
>
> Header files private to a driver should be alongside the driver. Look
> at drivers/net or drivers/scsi for plenty of examples.
>
> Just because its a header file does not mean it must be in some directory
> with 'include' in its path. The only reason to put it in include/linux
> is if it contains stuff which needs to be shared outside of the driver
> (eg, with arches).
I agree. Right now I have a creepy feeling that many drivers are just
putting headers in <mach/foo.h> out of habit, when plain "foo.h" in
working dir or <linux/subsystem/foo.h> is what is really apropriate.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists