[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20110601081105.317606570@blue.kroah.org>
Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2011 17:09:58 +0900
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...nel.org
Cc: stable-review@...nel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...e.de>,
Jens Axboe <jaxboe@...ionio.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>
Subject: [028/165] block: add proper state guards to __elv_next_request
2.6.39-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
------------------
Content-Length: 992
Lines: 32
From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...e.de>
commit 0a58e077eb600d1efd7e54ad9926a75a39d7f8ae upstream.
blk_cleanup_queue() calls elevator_exit() and after this, we can't
touch the elevator without oopsing. __elv_next_request() must check
for this state because in the refcounted queue model, we can still
call it after blk_cleanup_queue() has been called.
This was reported as causing an oops attributable to scsi.
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...e.de>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <jaxboe@...ionio.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>
---
block/blk.h | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/block/blk.h
+++ b/block/blk.h
@@ -81,7 +81,8 @@ static inline struct request *__elv_next
q->flush_queue_delayed = 1;
return NULL;
}
- if (!q->elevator->ops->elevator_dispatch_fn(q, 0))
+ if (test_bit(QUEUE_FLAG_DEAD, &q->queue_flags) ||
+ !q->elevator->ops->elevator_dispatch_fn(q, 0))
return NULL;
}
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists