lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 1 Jun 2011 21:38:59 +0900
From:	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
To:	Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@...il.com>
Cc:	linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>,
	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Make GFP_DMA allocations w/o ZONE_DMA emit a warning
 instead of failing

2011/6/1 Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@...il.com>:
> Please be more polite to other people. After a197b59ae6 all allocations
> with GFP_DMA set on nodes without ZONE_DMA fail nearly silently (only
> one warning during bootup is emited, no matter how many things fail).
> This is a very crude change on behaviour. To be more civil, instead of
> failing emit noisy warnings each time smbd. tries to allocate a GFP_DMA
> memory on non-ZONE_DMA node.
>
> This change should be reverted after one or two major releases, but
> we should be more accurate rather than hoping for the best.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@...il.com>
> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
> Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
> Cc: Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>
> Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
> Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>

Instaed of, shouldn't we revert a197b59ae6? Some arch don't have
DMA_ZONE at all.
and a197b59ae6 only care x86 embedded case. If we accept your patch, I
can imagine
other people will claim warn foold is a bug. ;)

However, I think, you should explain which platform and drivers hit
this breakage.
Otherwise developers can't learn which platform should care.

Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ