linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] memcg: do not expose uninitialized mem_cgroup_per

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20110601134149.GD4266@tiehlicka.suse.cz>
Date:	Wed, 1 Jun 2011 15:41:50 +0200
From:	Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>
To:	Igor Mammedov <imammedo@...hat.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com,
	balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	linux-mm@...ck.org, Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com>,
	Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>,
	containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] memcg: do not expose uninitialized mem_cgroup_per_node
 to world

[Let's CC some cgroup people]

On Wed 01-06-11 15:07:40, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> On 06/01/2011 02:39 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> >On Wed 01-06-11 12:44:04, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> >>Freshly allocated 'mem_cgroup_per_node' list entries must be
> >>initialized before the rest of the kernel can see them. Otherwise
> >>zero initialized list fields can lead to race condition at
> >>mem_cgroup_force_empty_list:
> >>   pc = list_entry(list->prev, struct page_cgroup, lru);
> >>where 'pc' will be something like 0xfffffffc if list->prev is 0
> >>and cause page fault later when 'pc' is dereferenced.
> >
> >Have you ever seen such a race? I do not see how this could happen.
> >mem_cgroup_force_empty_list is called only from
> >mem_cgroup_force_empty_write (aka echo whatever>  group/force_empty)
> >or mem_cgroup_pre_destroy when the group is destroyed.
> >
> >The initialization code is, however, called before a group is
> >given for use AFAICS.
> >
> >I am not saying tha the change is bad, I like it, but I do not think it
> >is a fix for potential race condition.
> >
> 
> Yes I've seen it (RHBZ#700565). 

I am not subscribed so I will not get there.

> It causes random crashes in virt env ocasionally. It's easier to
> reproduce if you overcommit cpu.

Hmm, I have missed that cgroup_create calls create callback for all
subsystems that the group should be attached to. But this shouldn't be
any problem as cgroup_call_pre_destroy (called from cgroup_rmdir) cannot
be called before the directory is actually created. 
cgroup_create_dir is called after cgroup has been created for all
subsystems so the directory entry will show up only after everything is
initialized AFAICS.  So I still do not see how we can race.

Anyway, if you are able to reproduce the problem then I would say that
the problem is somewhere in the generic cgroup code rather than in
memory controler. The patch just papers over a real bug IMO. But I may
be wrong as I am not definitely an expert in the area.

> 
> >>Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov<imammedo@...hat.com>
> >>---
> >>  mm/memcontrol.c |    2 +-
> >>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> >>
> >>diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> >>index bd9052a..ee7cb4c 100644
> >>--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> >>+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> >>@@ -4707,7 +4707,6 @@ static int alloc_mem_cgroup_per_zone_info(struct mem_cgroup *mem, int node)
> >>  	if (!pn)
> >>  		return 1;
> >>
> >>-	mem->info.nodeinfo[node] = pn;
> >>  	for (zone = 0; zone<  MAX_NR_ZONES; zone++) {
> >>  		mz =&pn->zoneinfo[zone];
> >>  		for_each_lru(l)
> >>@@ -4716,6 +4715,7 @@ static int alloc_mem_cgroup_per_zone_info(struct mem_cgroup *mem, int node)
> >>  		mz->on_tree = false;
> >>  		mz->mem = mem;
> >>  	}
> >>+	mem->info.nodeinfo[node] = pn;
> >>  	return 0;
> >>  }
> >>
> >>-- 
> >>1.7.1

-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
SUSE LINUX s.r.o.
Lihovarska 1060/12
190 00 Praha 9    
Czech Republic
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/