linux-kernel - [PATCH] sched: fix conflict of schedule domain balance in RT scheduling

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <BANLkTikoVj42S1iBHU_xFEpuGxY+TqmweA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 1 Jun 2011 21:58:54 +0800
From:	Hillf Danton <dhillf@...il.com>
To:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
	Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@...il.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: [PATCH] sched: fix conflict of schedule domain balance in RT scheduling

SD_BALANCE_WAKE and SD_WAKE_AFFINE are defined to be mutually exclusive, and
are checked in select_task_rq_rt() and find_lowest_rq() respectively.

The target cpu that is elected only from schedule domains of SD_WAKE_AFFINE if
CPU topology concerned, conflicts with the SD_BALANCE_WAKE requirement.

And checking for cache-hot is also added to confirm the comment there.

Signed-off-by: Hillf Danton <dhillf@...il.com>
---
 kernel/sched_rt.c |    7 ++++---
 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched_rt.c b/kernel/sched_rt.c
index 88725c9..87c44e6 100644
--- a/kernel/sched_rt.c
+++ b/kernel/sched_rt.c
@@ -1005,7 +1005,7 @@ select_task_rq_rt(struct task_struct *p, int
sd_flag, int flags)
 	struct rq *rq;
 	int cpu;

-	if (sd_flag != SD_BALANCE_WAKE)
+	if (!(sd_flag & SD_BALANCE_WAKE))
 		return smp_processor_id();

 	cpu = task_cpu(p);
@@ -1253,7 +1253,8 @@ static int find_lowest_rq(struct task_struct *task)
 	 * We prioritize the last cpu that the task executed on since
 	 * it is most likely cache-hot in that location.
 	 */
-	if (cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, lowest_mask))
+	if (cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, lowest_mask) &&
+	    task_hot(task, task_rq(task)->clock_task, NULL))
 		return cpu;

 	/*
@@ -1265,7 +1266,7 @@ static int find_lowest_rq(struct task_struct *task)

 	rcu_read_lock();
 	for_each_domain(cpu, sd) {
-		if (sd->flags & SD_WAKE_AFFINE) {
+		if (sd->flags & (SD_WAKE_AFFINE | SD_BALANCE_WAKE)) {
 			int best_cpu;

 			/*
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/