linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ATMEL, AVR32: inline nand partition table access

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <BANLkTi=s4kGg5NKrzNs1nu8S00Ue_Zv8vQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 1 Jun 2011 18:54:30 +0400
From:	Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@...il.com>
To:	Hans-Christian Egtvedt <hans-christian.egtvedt@...el.com>
Cc:	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, Andrew Victor <linux@...im.org.za>,
	Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>,
	Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard <plagnioj@...osoft.com>,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ATMEL, AVR32: inline nand partition table access

On 6/1/11, Hans-Christian Egtvedt <hans-christian.egtvedt@...el.com> wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-05-29 at 17:49 +0400, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote:
>> Currently atmel_nand driver used by AT91 and AVR32 calls a special
>> callback
>> which return nand partition table and number of partitions. However in all
>> boards this callback returns just static data. So drop this callback and
>> make atmel_nand use partition table provided statically via platform_data.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@...il.com>
>
> Thanks for this update, always nice seeing code being optimized. I
> really can't recall why it was made like this in the first place...
>
> For the AVR32 related parts:
>
> Acked-by: Hans-Christian Egtvedt <hans-christian.egtvedt@...el.com>
>
> <snipp diff>
>
> Will this go through the linux-mtd tree (since it spans two archs) or
> should it go through an arch tree?

On one hand, I'd prefer for this to go through the linux-mtd, if noone objects,
as I'd also like to submit several (a pile) patches cleaning up mtd
partitioning, which would depend on this.

OTOH, I think there will be a cleanup of AT91 platform, which would bring
lot's of conflicts with this patch, if it goes through linux-mtd.

-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/