[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1106012212420.5871@ask.diku.dk>
Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 22:13:05 +0200 (CEST)
From: Julia Lawall <julia@...u.dk>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: joe@...ches.com, wg@...ndegger.com,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, socketcan-core@...ts.berlios.de,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/10] drivers/net/can/flexcan.c: add missing clk_put
On Wed, 1 Jun 2011, David Miller wrote:
> From: Julia Lawall <julia@...u.dk>
> Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 22:08:46 +0200 (CEST)
>
> > On Wed, 1 Jun 2011, Joe Perches wrote:
> >
> >> On Wed, 2011-06-01 at 19:10 +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> >> > The failed_get label is used after the call to clk_get has succeeded, so it
> >> > should be moved up above the call to clk_put.
> >> []
> >> > diff --git a/drivers/net/can/flexcan.c b/drivers/net/can/flexcan.c
> >> []
> >> > @@ -978,8 +978,8 @@ static int __devinit flexcan_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >> > failed_map:
> >> > release_mem_region(mem->start, mem_size);
> >> > failed_req:
> >> > - clk_put(clk);
> >> > failed_get:
> >> > + clk_put(clk);
> >> > failed_clock:
> >> > return err;
> >>
> >> If this is correct, it might be better to rename all the
> >> uses of failed_req to failed_get and delete label failed_req.
> >
> > As I replied to Walter Harms, I believe it is correct, because I don't see
> > anything in the called functions that needs to be freed. I can redo the
> > patch to eliminate the label.
>
> Please do.
OK, I will do it tomorrow.
julia
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists