linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/4] Some x86, asm cleanups

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 1 Jun 2011 22:40:22 +0200
From:	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] Some x86, asm cleanups

On Wed, Jun 01, 2011 at 11:19:44AM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> >  as --version
> > GNU assembler 2.16.91.0.5 20051219 (SUSE Linux)
> > Copyright 2005 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
> > This program is free software; you may redistribute it under the terms of
> > the GNU General Public License.  This program has absolutely no warranty.
> > This assembler was configured for a target of `x86_64-suse-linux'.
> > 
> > at least this is one incarnation of it. I had to install SLES10 SP3
> > with the unpatched binutils version in kvm to test. And yes, the kernel
> > builds fine. Let me know if I should run some randconfigs, in addition.
> > 
> > Btw, I'm keeping the kvm image for future testing with the bat from hell :).
> > 
> 
> I think 2.16.9x is really 2.17.

Well, this is the one we had problems last time:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=128568422205398&w=2

Do you know per chance a distro version that has the one gas from hell
you mean so I could test with it additionally?

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/