[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BANLkTikoO5F5H4sEUoDPKX3qiahuehp=Mg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 16:04:53 +0800
From: Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@...il.com>
To: Hillf Danton <dhillf@...il.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: remove resetting exec_start in put_prev_task_rt()
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 10:03 PM, Hillf Danton <dhillf@...il.com> wrote:
> Resetting exec_start, after updated in update_curr_rt(), could open window for
> messing up the subsequent computations of delta_exec of the given task.
I can't see how could this happen. what kind of 'subsequent computations'
do you mean?
But because exec_start will be reset by _pick_next_task_rt()/set_curr_task_rt(),
you patch is ok. IMHO it is not critical, it's just cleanup instead.
Thanks,
Yong
>
> Signed-off-by: Hillf Danton <dhillf@...il.com>
> ---
> kernel/sched_rt.c | 1 -
> 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched_rt.c b/kernel/sched_rt.c
> index 88725c9..0f0cfce 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched_rt.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched_rt.c
> @@ -1166,7 +1166,6 @@ static struct task_struct
> *pick_next_task_rt(struct rq *rq)
> static void put_prev_task_rt(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
> {
> update_curr_rt(rq);
> - p->se.exec_start = 0;
>
> /*
> * The previous task needs to be made eligible for pushing
>
--
Only stand for myself
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists