[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110602090509.GB7800@elte.hu>
Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 11:05:09 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] MAINTAINERS: Remove unused PERFORMANCE EVENTS pattern
* Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-06-02 at 09:40 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > * Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> wrote:
> > > No arch/*/lib/perf_event* files exist so remove the pattern.
> > The arch/*/lib/ hierarchy is a common place to put stuff into, it
> > does not hurt at all to have it mentioned.
>
> Every once in awhile I run a script on MAINTAINERS
> and fix up defects found by the script.
>
> Dead code is dead code.
> This was unused as of commit e360adbe2924.
NAK, i've outlined my reasons:
- It's an obvious pattern to put librarized functionality in there
and should an architecture grow a file there in the future it
will be included automatically.
- What we are interested in are false positives (files included that
should not be matched) and false negatives (files belonging to a
subsystm not included) - this pattern is none of those.
> > stop mucking with these patterns and start dealing with some of
> > the more important problems we have?
>
> My time, my choice on what to do with it.
Yes, but this time you are also wasting my time with such a stupid
patch, so it's not just your time wasted anymore.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists