[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4DE7637B.3060901@stericsson.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 12:18:35 +0200
From: Mattias Wallin <mattias.wallin@...ricsson.com>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 0/3] clocksource: add db8500 PRCMU timer
On 06/02/2011 11:46 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> Why don't we just find a way of fixing sched_clock so that the value
> doesn't reset over a suspend/resume cycle?
Even if the value isn't reset during suspend/resume we want the
clocksource to keep counting. Or is it ok to have the clocksource stop
or freeze during suspend?
Then we have cpuidle. Is it ok to stop/freeze the timer during cpuidle
sleep states?
My view is that sched_clock and the clocksource read should return the
time since boot and keep counting during sleep and suspend. (In this
case we use the same timer for both sched_clk and clocksource.)
> IOW, lets fix the problem
> for_everyone_ rather than only fixing it for one platform at a time.
I agree that fixing it for everyone would be better and I can give it a
try if I get pointed in the right direction.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists