[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4DE77125.6000800@fusionio.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 13:16:53 +0200
From: Jens Axboe <jaxboe@...ionio.com>
To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [git pull v3.0-rc1] What branch to base fixes for v3.0-rc1 for
block system?
On 2011-06-01 17:15, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 09:25:11PM +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> On 2011-05-31 21:10, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
>>> Hey Jens,
>>>
>>> I've got two tiny fixes for the xen-blkback (see below):
>>>
>>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/konrad/xen.git for-jens/xen-blkback.fixes
>>>
>>> and they are based on for-2.6.40/drivers branch. Is that the way you
>>> prefer to pull patches from sub-trees? Or should I rebase it on 3.0-rc1?
>>> Or should send bug-fixes just directly to Linus?
>>
>> Once I send off the big initial merges which are in the version named
>> for-2.6.40/xx branches, anything after that should just be based on my
>> for-linus branch. That's what I use for post-rc1 merges with Linus.
>>
>> But the only real sticking point is that your branch should not contain
>> something that I don't have in my for-linus. And you don't right now, so
>> I just pulled it :-)
>
> Can you repull that branch please? I've rebased it on for-linus branch
> and fixed the embarrassing compilation issue it had..
Repulled, and it seems to compile as well this time :-)
--
Jens Axboe
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists