[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201106021546.37924.florian@openwrt.org>
Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 15:46:37 +0200
From: Florian Fainelli <florian@...nwrt.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] VLYNQ: vlynq_enable_device should try remote enabling first
Andrew,
On Friday 11 March 2011 11:57:28 Florian Fainelli wrote:
> I noticed device lockups on TNETD7200 chips when vlynq_enable_device tried
> enabling the device in the following order: external -> local -> remote
>
> inverting the external and remote order fixes the lock up and allows normal
> operation of the remote VLYNQ device on all TNETD generations (7100, 7200,
> 7300).
>
> Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <florian@...nwrt.org>
I did not get a feedback from you whether you applied this patch or not, it is
still valid though.
Thank you.
> ---
> diff --git a/drivers/vlynq/vlynq.c b/drivers/vlynq/vlynq.c
> index f885c86..0dd05ce 100644
> --- a/drivers/vlynq/vlynq.c
> +++ b/drivers/vlynq/vlynq.c
> @@ -516,9 +516,9 @@ static int __vlynq_enable_device(struct vlynq_device
> *dev) !__vlynq_try_external(dev))
> return 0;
> } else {
> - if (!__vlynq_try_external(dev) ||
> - !__vlynq_try_local(dev) ||
> - !__vlynq_try_remote(dev))
> + if (!__vlynq_try_remote(dev) ||
> + !__vlynq_try_local(dev) ||
> + !__vlynq_try_external(dev))
> return 0;
> }
> break;
> --
> 1.7.1
--
Florian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists