linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] drivers/usb/gadget/inode.c: add missing kfree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 2 Jun 2011 16:56:35 +0200 (CEST)
From:	Julia Lawall <julia@...u.dk>
To:	Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
Cc:	David Brownell <dbrownell@...rs.sourceforge.net>,
	kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers/usb/gadget/inode.c: add missing kfree

On Thu, 2 Jun 2011, Alan Stern wrote:

> On Thu, 2 Jun 2011, Julia Lawall wrote:
> 
> > From: Julia Lawall <julia@...u.dk>
> > 
> > The label fail frees dev->buf, but kbuf hasn't yet been stored there at
> > this point.
> 
> ...
> 
> > Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <julia@...u.dk>
> > 
> > ---
> > I wonder if it is really correct to free dev->buf at fail in this case.
> > Because it is freeing the previously allocated value of dev->buf, not the
> > current one as done in subsequent cases.
> 
> I don't think it matters.  This check is probably there only for 
> safety; it should not be possible for dev->buf to be non-NULL at this 
> point.  You ought to be able to remove the entire
> 
> 	if (dev->buf)
> 		goto fail;
> 
> statement with no ill effects.

I can send such a patch if you think it is OK.  But I have no way to test 
it.

julia
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/