[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1307029931-17236-1-git-send-email-akinobu.mita@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 00:52:11 +0900
From: Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@...il.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@...il.com>,
"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>,
Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@...ger.ca>,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v3] ext4: use proper little-endian bitops
ext4_{set,clear}_bit() is defined as __test_and_{set,clear}_bit_le()
for ext4. Only two ext4_{set,clear}_bit() calls check the return
value. The rest of calls ignore the return value and they can be
replaced with __{set,clear}_bit_le().
This changes ext4_{set,clear}_bit() from __test_and_{set,clear}_bit_le()
to __{set,clear}_bit_le() and introduces ext4_test_and_{set,clear}_bit()
for the two places where old bit needs to be returned.
This ext4_{set,clear}_bit() change is considered safe, because if someone
uses these macros without noticing the change, new ext4_{set,clear}_bit
don't have return value and causes compiler errors where the return
value is used.
This also removes unused ext4_find_first_zero_bit().
Signed-off-by: Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@...il.com>
Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>
Cc: Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@...ger.ca>
Cc: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
---
v3: squash into a single patch and do not remove ext4_*_bit_atomic() macros
v2: rewritten to keep ext4_*_bit() macros
fs/ext4/ext4.h | 7 ++++---
fs/ext4/ialloc.c | 4 ++--
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/ext4/ext4.h b/fs/ext4/ext4.h
index 1921392..cb65177 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/ext4.h
+++ b/fs/ext4/ext4.h
@@ -930,12 +930,13 @@ struct ext4_inode_info {
#define test_opt2(sb, opt) (EXT4_SB(sb)->s_mount_opt2 & \
EXT4_MOUNT2_##opt)
-#define ext4_set_bit __test_and_set_bit_le
+#define ext4_test_and_set_bit __test_and_set_bit_le
+#define ext4_set_bit __set_bit_le
#define ext4_set_bit_atomic ext2_set_bit_atomic
-#define ext4_clear_bit __test_and_clear_bit_le
+#define ext4_test_and_clear_bit __test_and_clear_bit_le
+#define ext4_clear_bit __clear_bit_le
#define ext4_clear_bit_atomic ext2_clear_bit_atomic
#define ext4_test_bit test_bit_le
-#define ext4_find_first_zero_bit find_first_zero_bit_le
#define ext4_find_next_zero_bit find_next_zero_bit_le
#define ext4_find_next_bit find_next_bit_le
diff --git a/fs/ext4/ialloc.c b/fs/ext4/ialloc.c
index 21bb2f6..e3de479 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/ialloc.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/ialloc.c
@@ -252,7 +252,7 @@ void ext4_free_inode(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode)
fatal = ext4_journal_get_write_access(handle, bh2);
}
ext4_lock_group(sb, block_group);
- cleared = ext4_clear_bit(bit, bitmap_bh->b_data);
+ cleared = ext4_test_and_clear_bit(bit, bitmap_bh->b_data);
if (fatal || !cleared) {
ext4_unlock_group(sb, block_group);
goto out;
@@ -729,7 +729,7 @@ static int ext4_claim_inode(struct super_block *sb,
*/
down_read(&grp->alloc_sem);
ext4_lock_group(sb, group);
- if (ext4_set_bit(ino, inode_bitmap_bh->b_data)) {
+ if (ext4_test_and_set_bit(ino, inode_bitmap_bh->b_data)) {
/* not a free inode */
retval = 1;
goto err_ret;
--
1.7.4.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists