[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110602164841.GK23047@sequoia.sous-sol.org>
Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 09:48:41 -0700
From: Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>
To: Andrea Righi <andrea@...terlinux.com>
Cc: CAI Qian <caiqian@...hat.com>, Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>, Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>,
Izik Eidus <ieidus@...hat.com>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [BUG 3.0.0-rc1] ksm: NULL pointer dereference in ksm_do_scan()
* Andrea Righi (andrea@...terlinux.com) wrote:
> mmh.. I can reproduce the bug also with the standard ubuntu (11.04)
> kernel. Could you post your .config?
Andrea (Righi), can you tell me if this WARN fires? This looks
like a pure race between removing from list and checking list, i.e.
insufficient locking.
ksm_scan.mm_slot == the only registered mm
CPU 1 (bug program) CPU 2 (ksmd)
list_empty() is false
lock
ksm_scan.mm_slot
list_del
unlock
slot == &ksm_mm_head (but list is now empty_)
diff --git a/mm/ksm.c b/mm/ksm.c
index 942dfc7..ab79a92 100644
--- a/mm/ksm.c
+++ b/mm/ksm.c
@@ -1301,6 +1301,7 @@ static struct rmap_item *scan_get_next_rmap_item(struct page **page)
slot = list_entry(slot->mm_list.next, struct mm_slot, mm_list);
ksm_scan.mm_slot = slot;
spin_unlock(&ksm_mmlist_lock);
+ WARN_ON(slot == &ksm_mm_head);
next_mm:
ksm_scan.address = 0;
ksm_scan.rmap_list = &slot->rmap_list;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists