[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110602173330.GA20384@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 19:33:30 +0200
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: vda.linux@...glemail.com, jan.kratochvil@...hat.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, indan@....nu, bdonlan@...il.com,
pedro@...esourcery.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 17/17] ptrace: implement PTRACE_LISTEN
On 05/30, Tejun Heo wrote:
>
> This allows ptracer to monitor group stop state without running tracee
> - use INTERRUPT to put tracee into STOP trap, issue LISTEN and then
> wait(2) to wait for the next group stop event. When it happens,
> PTRACE_GETSIGINFO provides information to determine the current state.
Great. Just a couple of questions,
> --- a/kernel/exit.c
> +++ b/kernel/exit.c
> @@ -1416,7 +1416,7 @@ static int wait_task_stopped(struct wait_opts *wo,
> spin_lock_irq(&p->sighand->siglock);
>
> p_code = task_stopped_code(p, ptrace);
> - if (unlikely(!p_code))
> + if (unlikely(!p_code) || p->jobctl & JOBCTL_LISTENING)
> goto unlock_sig;
Up to you, but perhaps this JOBCTL_LISTENING check should go into
task_stopped_code() ? Or do you think we can't check it without
siglock?
> + case PTRACE_LISTEN:
> + /*
> + * Listen for events. Tracee must be in STOP. It's not
> + * resumed per-se but is not considered to be in TRACED by
> + * wait(2) or ptrace(2). If an async event (e.g. group
> + * stop state change) happens, tracee will enter STOP trap
> + * again. Alternatively, ptracer can issue INTERRUPT to
> + * finish listening and re-trap tracee into STOP.
> + */
> + if (unlikely(!seized || !lock_task_sighand(child, &flags)))
> + break;
> +
> + si = child->last_siginfo;
> + if (unlikely(!si || si->si_code != PTRACE_STOP_SI_CODE))
> + break;
> +
> + child->jobctl |= JOBCTL_LISTENING;
> +
> + /*
> + * If NOTIFY is set, it means event happened between start
> + * of this trap and now. Trigger re-trap immediately.
> + */
> + if (child->jobctl & JOBCTL_TRAP_NOTIFY)
> + signal_wake_up(child, true);
Again, I won't insist if you prefer signal_wake_up(), but afaics
wake_up_state(__TASK_TRACED) should be enough.
> @@ -838,7 +840,7 @@ static void ptrace_trap_notify(struct task_struct *t)
> assert_spin_locked(&t->sighand->siglock);
>
> task_set_jobctl_pending(t, JOBCTL_TRAP_NOTIFY);
> - signal_wake_up(t, 0);
> + signal_wake_up(t, t->jobctl & JOBCTL_LISTENING);
> }
OK. The only thing I can't understand is why prepare_signal(SIGCONT)
calls ptrace_trap_notify() unconditionally. How about
if (likely(!(t->ptrace & PT_SEIZED)))
wake_up_state(t, __TASK_STOPPED);
- else
+ else if (why)
ptrace_trap_notify(t);
?
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists