[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110602182302.GA2802@random.random>
Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 20:23:02 +0200
From: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>
To: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, Ury Stankevich <urykhy@...il.com>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: compaction: Abort compaction if too many pages are
isolated and caller is asynchronous
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 11:38:30PM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> > Yes. You find a new BUG.
> > It seems to be related to this problem but it should be solved although
>
> typo : It doesn't seem to be.
This should fix it, but I doubt it matters for this problem.
===
Subject: mm: no page_count without a page pin
From: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>
It's unsafe to run page_count during the physical pfn scan.
Signed-off-by: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>
---
diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index faa0a08..e41e78a 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -1124,8 +1124,18 @@ static unsigned long isolate_lru_pages(unsigned long nr_to_scan,
nr_lumpy_dirty++;
scan++;
} else {
- /* the page is freed already. */
- if (!page_count(cursor_page))
+ /*
+ * We can't use page_count() as that
+ * requires compound_head and we don't
+ * have a pin on the page here. If a
+ * page is tail, we may or may not
+ * have isolated the head, so assume
+ * it's not free, it'd be tricky to
+ * track the head status without a
+ * page pin.
+ */
+ if (!PageTail(cursor_page) &&
+ !atomic_read(&cursor_page->_count))
continue;
break;
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists