linux-kernel - Re: [patch 7/8] vmscan: memcg-aware unevictable page rescue scanner

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <BANLkTik1X72Re_QKM4iCaPbxCx2kcnfH_w@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 3 Jun 2011 07:01:34 +0900
From:	Hiroyuki Kamezawa <kamezawa.hiroyuki@...il.com>
To:	Ying Han <yinghan@...gle.com>
Cc:	Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
	Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp>,
	Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
	Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, Greg Thelen <gthelen@...gle.com>,
	Michel Lespinasse <walken@...gle.com>,
	"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 7/8] vmscan: memcg-aware unevictable page rescue scanner

2011/6/3 Ying Han <yinghan@...gle.com>:
> On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 6:27 AM, Hiroyuki Kamezawa
> <kamezawa.hiroyuki@...il.com> wrote:
>> 2011/6/1 Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>:
>>> Once the per-memcg lru lists are exclusive, the unevictable page
>>> rescue scanner can no longer work on the global zone lru lists.
>>>
>>> This converts it to go through all memcgs and scan their respective
>>> unevictable lists instead.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
>>
>> Hm, isn't it better to have only one GLOBAL LRU for unevictable pages ?
>> memcg only needs counter for unevictable pages and LRU is not necessary
>> to be per memcg because we don't reclaim it...
>
> Hmm. Are we suggesting to keep one un-evictable LRU list for all
> memcgs? So we will have
> exclusive lru only for file and anon. If so, we are not done to make
> all the lru list being exclusive
> which is critical later to improve the zone->lru_lock contention
> across the memcgs
>
considering lrulock, yes, maybe you're right.

> Sorry If i misinterpret the suggestion here
>

My concern is I don't know for what purpose this function is used ..


Thanks,
-Kame
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/