[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4DE71B09.70304@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2011 13:09:29 +0800
From: Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>
To: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>
CC: Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
"Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>,
"linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
"Zhang, Yanmin" <yanmin.zhang@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/9] PCIe, AER, add aer_recover_queue
Hi, Jesse,
On 06/02/2011 02:49 AM, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> On Tue, 17 May 2011 16:08:37 +0800
> Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com> wrote:
>
>> In addition to native PCIe AER, now APEI (ACPI Platform Error
>> Interface) GHES (Generic Hardware Error Source) can be used to report
>> PCIe AER errors too. To add support to APEI GHES PCIe AER recovery,
>> aer_recover_queue is added to export the recovery function in native
>> PCIe AER driver.
>>
>> Recoverable PCIe AER errors are reported via NMI in APEI GHES. Then
>> APEI GHES uses irq_work to delay the error processing into an IRQ
>> handler. But PCIe AER recovery can be very time-consuming, so
>> aer_recover_queue, which can be used in IRQ handler, delays the real
>> recovery action into the process context, that is, work queue.
>
> Have the dependencies for this already landed? Or does this one need
> to go first?
This patch has no external dependencies and can go first.
Best Regards,
Huang Ying
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists