[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110602154754.142920c6@notabene.brown>
Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 15:47:54 +1000
From: NeilBrown <neilb@...e.de>
To: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...il.com>
Cc: linux-raid@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] md: convert double atomic_inc() to atomic_add()
On Thu, 2 Jun 2011 13:53:02 +0900 Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...il.com> wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...il.com>
> ---
> drivers/md/md.c | 3 +--
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/md/md.c b/drivers/md/md.c
> index aa640a85bb21..f210e42a56ca 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/md.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/md.c
> @@ -396,8 +396,7 @@ static void submit_flushes(struct work_struct *ws)
> * we reclaim rcu_read_lock
> */
> struct bio *bi;
> - atomic_inc(&rdev->nr_pending);
> - atomic_inc(&rdev->nr_pending);
> + atomic_add(2, &rdev->nr_pending);
> rcu_read_unlock();
> bi = bio_alloc_mddev(GFP_KERNEL, 0, mddev);
> bi->bi_end_io = md_end_flush;
Thanks, but I don't think I want this patch.
I'm happy having two separate 'atomic_inc' calls. I think it makes it a bit
clearer what is happening, and it is easier to search for all atomic_inc
calls.
NeilBrown
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists