lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BANLkTikR4HNnFsYm2ymm1+FTbeeXtvH51g@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 2 Jun 2011 00:34:58 -0600
From:	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
To:	john stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>
Cc:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-serial@...r.kernel.org, Alan Cox <alan@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: /proc/stat btime accuracy problem

On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 6:49 PM, john stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-06-01 at 18:31 -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 5:58 PM, john stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com> wrote:
>> > My first instinct is "don't do that!" to whatever driver is disabling
>> > irqs for so long. Do you know what's actually causing these long irq off
>> > periods?
>> >
>> > I assume you're noticing this offset by seeing that CLOCK_REALTIME is
>> > off from the RTC right after boot? How severe is this? The RTC read is
>> > only second granular, so there's a fair amount of error (~1 second)
>> > possible right at boot, so this then must be many seconds worth of lost
>> > ticks to be noticeable, right?
>>
>> I'm using 2.6.34, so not really new.  I think the major offender is
>> kernel serial printk, which is done in polled mode.  A *lot* of it,
>> e.g., 30+ seconds' worth.
>
> CC'ing the linux-serial list and Alan for their thoughts: Does the
> serial port is disabling irqs for 30+ seconds during boot seem at all
> sane?
>
> I would think it would periodically enable irqs in the polling loop to
> let things be processed, but maybe not?
>
>>   I wonder if there's some reasonably clean
>> way to resync with the RTC, say at the time we register a clocksource
>> better than jiffies, or in clocksource_done_booting(), or something.
>
> I definitely think we need to address the long irq disable periods
> instead of trying to hack around the issue in the timekeeping code.

OK, I have a theory.  Here are snippets from my dmesg log (this is
from a current upstream kernel).  The "BH" lines are instrumentation I
added to read the RTC at a few places:

  Linux version 3.0.0-smp-DEV ...
  BH now   rtc 1306992452 (start_kernel, before setup_arch)
      Printk 230K of numa=fake debug stuff (more than seems strictly
      necessary to me, but there it is).  All this data goes into the log
      buffer, not to the UART, because the console hasn't been
      initialized yet.
  Command line: auto BOOT_IMAGE=300smpD ro root=/dev/hda1,/dev/sda1
ignore_loglevel console=ttyS0,115200n8 swiotlb=16000 numa=fake=16M

  BH now   rtc 1306992457 (start_kernel, after mm init)

  BH btime rtc 1306992457 xt 1306992457 wtm -1306992457 (timekeeping_init)
      Snapshot btime and init xtime and wall_to_monotonic.  So
      theoretically, we should see 1306992457 in /proc/stat btime.

  Console: colour dummy device 80x25
  console [ttyS0] enabled
      Now ttyS0 is enabled, so we dump the log buffer to the UART.  I think
      this happens in console_unlock(), with interrupts disabled for the whole
      buffer.

  BH now   rtc 1306992481 xt 1306992459 wtm -1306992457
  clocksource_register jiffies
      This RTC read is in clocksource_register(); note that xtime is now
      22 seconds behind the RTC.  The UART is running at 115200 baud,
      and 230K/(115200/10) = about 20 seconds, so this sort of matches
      the time I expect it to take to dump the buffer.

  HPET: 3 timers in total, 0 timers will be used for per-cpu timer
  hpet0: at MMIO 0xfed00000, IRQs 2, 8, 0
  hpet0: 3 comparators, 64-bit 14.318180 MHz counter
  Switching to clocksource hpet

  Refined TSC clocksource calibration: 2400.084 MHz.
  Switching to clocksource tsc

  BH <set  rtc 1306992488 xt 1306992465 wtm -1306992457 to 1306992488
  BH settimeofday delta 23
  BH set>  rtc 1306992488 xt 1306992488 wtm -1306992480
      This settimeofday() call happens when userland runs "hwclock --hctosys".
      We adjust xtime and wall_to_monotonic by 23 seconds.

Finally, we read /proc/stat.  Since we only re-synced the system clock
to the RTC (we didn't sync to an external source), btime ought to be
the same as it was when we collected it, i.e., 1306992457.  But
instead, we get this, which I assume is the same wall_to_monotonic we
computed in settimeofday(), but rounded:

  btime 1306992479

Things that look interesting to me:
  - numa=fake prints an excessive amount of debug info!
  - We register the ttyS0 console before registering the jiffies clocksource.
    It seems like the jiffies clocksource ought to be registered about the
    same time we initialize xtime in timekeeping_init().
  - Interrupts are disabled the entire time we dump the log buffer, which
    could be a very long time.  Maybe we could restore/disable interrupts
    periodically there.

Bjorn
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ