linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 5/5] KVM: Expose a version 1 architectural PMU to guests

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 03 Jun 2011 16:41:51 +0200
From:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To:	Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 5/5] KVM: Expose a version 1 architectural PMU to
 guests

On Wed, 2011-05-11 at 11:55 -0400, Avi Kivity wrote:
> - counters that have PMI (interrupt) enabled stop counting after the
>   interrupt is signalled.  This is because we need one-shot samples
>   that keep counting, which perf doesn't support yet 

You'll have to reprogram the thing anyway, since not all hardware has
the same counter width:

[    0.046996] Performance Events: AMD PMU driver.
[    0.048998] ... bit width:              48

vs

[    0.026998] Performance Events: PEBS fmt0+, Core2 events, Intel PMU driver.
[    0.026998] ... bit width:              40

simply letting the thing run will not behave in a consistent fashion.

Or are you going to assume all software will properly read the cpuid
leaf and not assume bit width?

Also, I can't seem to locate where you fill that cpuid-leaf,
kvm_pmu_cpuid_update() seems to read the entry, not write it.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/