[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1307112115.2353.3392.camel@twins>
Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2011 16:41:55 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/5] perf: add context parameter to perf_event
overflow handler
On Wed, 2011-05-11 at 11:55 -0400, Avi Kivity wrote:
> +++ b/include/linux/perf_event.h
> @@ -709,7 +709,9 @@ struct perf_buffer {
>
> struct perf_sample_data;
>
> -typedef void (*perf_overflow_handler_t)(struct perf_event *, int,
> +typedef void (*perf_overflow_handler_t)(void *context,
> + struct perf_event *event,
> + int,
> struct perf_sample_data *,
> struct pt_regs *regs);
>
> @@ -855,6 +857,7 @@ struct perf_event {
> u64 id;
>
> perf_overflow_handler_t overflow_handler;
> + void *overflow_handler_context;
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_EVENT_TRACING
> struct ftrace_event_call *tp_event;
If you're adding a pointer here, then why pass it along in the callback
thing if it already has the perf_event *?
It seems to me the callback can easily do
event->overflow_handler_context if it needs the thing.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists