| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <isavsg$3or$1@dough.gmane.org> Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2011 17:50:40 +0200 From: Bernhard Held <bheld@...i.de> To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: KVM induced panic on 2.6.38[2367] & 2.6.39 Am 03.06.2011 15:38, schrieb Brad Campbell: > On 02/06/11 07:03, CaT wrote: >> On Wed, Jun 01, 2011 at 07:52:33PM +0800, Brad Campbell wrote: >>> Unfortunately the only interface that is mentioned by name anywhere >>> in my firewall is $DMZ (which is ppp0 and not part of any bridge). >>> >>> All of the nat/dnat and other horrible hacks are based on IP addresses. >> >> Damn. Not referencing the bridge interfaces at all stopped our host from >> going down in flames when we passed it a few packets. These are two >> of the oopses we got from it. Whilst the kernel here is .35 we got the >> same issue from a range of kernels. Seems related. > > Well, I tried sending an explanatory message to netdev, netfilter & cc'd to kvm, > but it appears not to have made it to kvm or netfilter, and the cc to netdev has > not elicited a response. My resend to netfilter seems to have dropped into the > bit bucket also. Just another reference 3.5 months ago: http://www.spinics.net/lists/netfilter-devel/msg17239.html Bernhard -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists