Date:	Fri,  3 Jun 2011 15:34:04 -0500
From:	Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	kees.cook@...onical.com, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...e.hu, rostedt@...dmis.org,
	jmorris@...ei.org, paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
	Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org>,
	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v4 05/13] seccomp_filter: Document what seccomp_filter is and how it works.

 Adds a text file covering what CONFIG_SECCOMP_FILTER is, how it is
 implemented presently, and what it may be used for.  In addition,
 the limitations and caveats of the proposed implementation are
 included.

 v4: rewording (courtesy kees.cook@...onical.com)
     reflect support for event ids
     add a small section on adding per-arch support
 v3: a little more cleanup
 v2: moved to prctl/
     updated for the v2 syntax.
     adds a note about compat behavior

 Signed-off-by: Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org>
---
 Documentation/prctl/seccomp_filter.txt |  181 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 files changed, 181 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 Documentation/prctl/seccomp_filter.txt

diff --git a/Documentation/prctl/seccomp_filter.txt b/Documentation/prctl/seccomp_filter.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..c289c86
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/prctl/seccomp_filter.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,181 @@
+		Seccomp filtering
+		=================
+
+Introduction
+------------
+
+A large number of system calls are exposed to every userland process
+with many of them going unused for the entire lifetime of the process.
+As system calls change and mature, bugs are found and eradicated.  A
+certain subset of userland applications benefit by having a reduced set
+of available system calls.  The resulting set reduces the total kernel
+surface exposed to the application.  System call filtering is meant for
+use with those applications.
+
+The implementation currently leverages both the existing seccomp
+infrastructure and the kernel tracing infrastructure.  By centralizing
+hooks for attack surface reduction in seccomp, it is possible to assure
+attention to security that is less relevant in normal ftrace scenarios,
+such as time-of-check, time-of-use attacks.  However, ftrace provides a
+rich, human-friendly environment for interfacing with system call
+specific arguments.  (As such, this requires FTRACE_SYSCALLS for any
+introspective filtering support.)
+
+
+What it isn't
+-------------
+
+System call filtering isn't a sandbox.  It provides a clearly defined
+mechanism for minimizing the exposed kernel surface.  Beyond that,
+policy for logical behavior and information flow should be managed with
+a combinations of other system hardening techniques and, potentially, a
+LSM of your choosing.  Expressive, dynamic filters based on the ftrace
+filter engine provide further options down this path (avoiding
+pathological sizes or selecting which of the multiplexed system calls in
+socketcall() is allowed, for instance) which could be construed,
+incorrectly, as a more complete sandboxing solution.
+
+
+Usage
+-----
+
+An additional seccomp mode is exposed through mode '2'.
+This mode depends on CONFIG_SECCOMP_FILTER.  By default, it provides
+only the most trivial of filter support "1" or cleared.  However, if
+CONFIG_FTRACE_SYSCALLS is enabled, the ftrace filter engine may be used
+for more expressive filters.
+
+A collection of filters may be supplied via prctl, and the current set
+of filters is exposed in /proc/<pid>/seccomp_filter.
+
+Interacting with seccomp filters can be done through three new prctl calls
+and one existing one.
+
+PR_SET_SECCOMP:
+	A pre-existing option for enabling strict seccomp mode (1) or
+	filtering seccomp (2).
+
+	Usage:
+		prctl(PR_SET_SECCOMP, 1);  /* strict */
+		prctl(PR_SET_SECCOMP, 2);  /* filters */
+
+PR_SET_SECCOMP_FILTER:
+	Allows the specification of a new filter for a given system
+	call, by number, and filter string.  By default, the filter
+	string may only be "1".  However, if CONFIG_FTRACE_SYSCALLS is
+	supported, the filter string may make use of the ftrace
+	filtering language's awareness of system call arguments.
+
+	In addition, the event id for the system call entry may be
+	specified in lieu of the system call number itself, as
+	determined by the 'type' argument.  This allows for the future
+	addition of seccomp-based filtering on other registered,
+	relevant ftrace events.
+
+	All calls to PR_SET_SECCOMP_FILTER for a given system
+	call will append the supplied string to any existing filters.
+	Filter construction looks as follows:
+		(Nothing) + "fd == 1 || fd == 2" => fd == 1 || fd == 2
+		... + "fd != 2" => (fd == 1 || fd == 2) && fd != 2
+		... + "size < 100" =>
+			((fd == 1 || fd == 2) && fd != 2) && size < 100
+	If there is no filter and the seccomp mode has already
+	transitioned to filtering, additions cannot be made.  Filters
+	may only be added that reduce the available kernel surface.
+
+	Usage (per the construction example above):
+		unsigned long type = PR_SECCOMP_FILTER_SYSCALL;
+		prctl(PR_SET_SECCOMP_FILTER, type, __NR_write,
+			"fd == 1 || fd == 2");
+		prctl(PR_SET_SECCOMP_FILTER, type, __NR_write,
+			"fd != 2");
+		prctl(PR_SET_SECCOMP_FILTER, type, __NR_write,
+			"size < 100");
+
+	The 'type' argument may be one of PR_SECCOMP_FILTER_SYSCALL or
+	PR_SECCOMP_FILTER_EVENT.
+
+PR_CLEAR_SECCOMP_FILTER:
+	Removes all filter entries for a given system call number or
+	event id.  When called prior to entering seccomp filtering mode,
+	it allows for new filters to be applied to the same system call.
+	After transition, however, it completely drops access to the
+	call.
+
+	Usage:
+		prctl(PR_CLEAR_SECCOMP_FILTER,
+			PR_SECCOMP_FILTER_SYSCALL, __NR_open);
+
+PR_GET_SECCOMP_FILTER:
+	Returns the aggregated filter string for a system call into a
+	user-supplied buffer of a given length.
+
+	Usage:
+		prctl(PR_GET_SECCOMP_FILTER,
+			PR_SECCOMP_FILTER_SYSCALL, __NR_write, buf,
+			sizeof(buf));
+
+All of the above calls return 0 on success and non-zero on error.  If
+CONFIG_FTRACE_SYSCALLS is not supported and a rich-filter was specified,
+the caller may check the errno for -ENOSYS.  The same is true if
+specifying an filter by the event id fails to discover any relevant
+event entries.
+
+
+Example
+-------
+
+Assume a process would like to cleanly read and write to stdin/out/err
+as well as access its filters after seccomp enforcement begins.  This
+may be done as follows:
+
+  int filter_syscall(int nr, char *buf) {
+    return prctl(PR_SET_SECCOMP_FILTER, PR_SECCOMP_FILTER_SYSCALL,
+                 nr, buf);
+  }
+
+  filter_syscall(__NR_read, "fd == 0");
+  filter_syscall(_NR_write, "fd == 1 || fd == 2");
+  filter_syscall(__NR_exit, "1");
+  filter_syscall(__NR_prctl, "1");
+  prctl(PR_SET_SECCOMP, 2);
+
+  /* Do stuff with fdset . . .*/
+
+  /* Drop read access and keep only write access to fd 1. */
+  prctl(PR_CLEAR_SECCOMP_FILTER, PR_SECCOMP_FILTER_SYSCALL, __NR_read);
+  filter_syscall(__NR_write, "fd != 2");
+
+  /* Perform any final processing . . . */
+  syscall(__NR_exit, 0);
+
+
+Caveats
+-------
+
+- Avoid using a filter of "0" to disable a filter.  Always favor calling
+  prctl(PR_CLEAR_SECCOMP_FILTER, ...).  Otherwise the behavior may vary
+  depending on if CONFIG_FTRACE_SYSCALLS support exists -- though an
+  error will be returned if the support is missing.
+
+- Some platforms support a 32-bit userspace with 64-bit kernels.  In
+  these cases (CONFIG_COMPAT), system call numbers may not match across
+  64-bit and 32-bit system calls. When the first PRCTL_SET_SECCOMP_FILTER
+  is called, the in-memory filters state is annotated with whether the
+  call has been made via the compat interface.  All subsequent calls will
+  be checked for compat call mismatch.  In the long run, it may make sense
+  to store compat and non-compat filters separately, but that is not
+  supported at present. Once one type of system call interface has been
+  used, it must be continued to be used.
+
+
+Adding architecture support
+-----------------------
+
+Any platform with seccomp support should be able to support the bare
+minimum of seccomp filter features.  However, since seccomp_filter
+requires that execve be blocked, it expects the architecture to expose a
+__NR_seccomp_execve define that maps to the execve system call number.
+On platforms where CONFIG_COMPAT applies, __NR_seccomp_execve_32 must
+also be provided.  Once those macros exist, "select HAVE_SECCOMP_FILTER"
+support may be added to the architectures Kconfig.
-- 
1.7.0.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists