[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4DE888BB.8000008@msgid.corpit.ru>
Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2011 11:09:47 +0400
From: lists+linux-kernel@...pit.ru
To: Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@....ocn.ne.jp>
CC: James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, greg@...ah.com, jslaby@...e.cz,
stable@...nel.org, jejb@...isc-linux.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [stable] apparent regression (crash) - 2.6.38.6
03.06.2011 11:01, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> commit 2e8532e0a9ee1d25b279ac78ee8ce31701e2aa15
> Author: Michael Tokarev <mjt@....msk.ru>
> Date: Fri Jun 3 10:50:49 2011 +0400
>
> block: add proper state guards to elv_queue_empty()
>
> Like in 0a58e077eb600d1efd7e54ad9926a75a39d7f8ae (backported to
> stable 2.6.38 as 0a58e077eb600d1efd7e54ad9926a75a39d7f8ae) which
> fixes this for __elv_next_request(), as reported by Atsushi Nemoto,
> elv_queue_empty() also needs to check for dead queue condition
> before touchin elevator.
>
> elv_queue_empty() has been removed upstream so this is only applicable
> for versions prior to 2.6.39, including 2.6.32-longterm.
Um, i'm not sure about this one -- 2.6.32 does not have
other pieces of this puzzle (and 2.6.38.8 was the last
in the 2.6.38.y series).
/mjt
> Signed-Off-By: Michael Tokarev <mjt@....msk.ru>
>
> diff --git a/block/elevator.c b/block/elevator.c
> index 236e93c..30cec25 100644
> --- a/block/elevator.c
> +++ b/block/elevator.c
> @@ -727,7 +727,8 @@ int elv_queue_empty(struct request_queue *q)
> if (!list_empty(&q->queue_head))
> return 0;
>
> - if (e->ops->elevator_queue_empty_fn)
> + if (!test_bit(QUEUE_FLAG_DEAD, &q->queue_flags) &&
> + e->ops->elevator_queue_empty_fn)
> return e->ops->elevator_queue_empty_fn(q);
>
> return 1;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists