[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4DEA5D78.5030402@centrum.cz>
Date: Sat, 04 Jun 2011 18:29:44 +0200
From: Karel Gardas <karel.gardas@...trum.cz>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: ETH over USB: NFS state (seeking ARM platform for NFS-based builds)
Hello,
while searching for ARMv7/NEON platform for my own hacking I've found
this interesting issue:
[ 2945.114135] cc1: page allocation failure. order:3, mode:0x4020
[ 2945.114196] [<c005a420>] (unwind_backtrace+0x0/0xe0) from
[<c0107e98>] (__alloc_pages_nodemask+0x5a0/0x6b4)
[ 2945.114227] [<c0107e98>] (__alloc_pages_nodemask+0x5a0/0x6b4) from
[<c0107fbc>] (__get_free_pages+0x10/0x24)
[ 2945.114257] [<c0107fbc>] (__get_free_pages+0x10/0x24) from
[<c012f494>] (kmalloc_order_trace+0x20/0xc8)
[ 2945.114288] [<c012f494>] (kmalloc_order_trace+0x20/0xc8) from
[<c04882fc>] (__alloc_skb+0x50/0xe0)
[ 2945.114318] [<c04882fc>] (__alloc_skb+0x50/0xe0) from [<c038b2ec>]
(rx_submit+0x24/0x1cc)
[ 2945.114349] [<c038b2ec>] (rx_submit+0x24/0x1cc) from [<c0395524>]
(usb_hcd_giveback_urb+0xa0/0xec)
[ 2945.114379] [<c0395524>] (usb_hcd_giveback_urb+0xa0/0xec) from
[<c03a1650>] (ehci_urb_done+0xa8/0xb4)
[ 2945.114410] [<c03a1650>] (ehci_urb_done+0xa8/0xb4) from [<c03a5488>]
(qh_completions+0xb4/0x3d8)
[ 2945.114440] [<c03a5488>] (qh_completions+0xb4/0x3d8) from
[<c03a5d94>] (scan_async+0x90/0x144)
[ 2945.114440] [<c03a5d94>] (scan_async+0x90/0x144) from [<c03a6504>]
(ehci_work+0x30/0x88)
[ 2945.114471] [<c03a6504>] (ehci_work+0x30/0x88) from [<c03a83f0>]
(ehci_irq+0x2f4/0x35c)
[ 2945.114471] [<c03a83f0>] (ehci_irq+0x2f4/0x35c) from [<c0394e90>]
(usb_hcd_irq+0x38/0x7c)
[ 2945.114501] [<c0394e90>] (usb_hcd_irq+0x38/0x7c) from [<c00d89b4>]
(handle_IRQ_event+0x9c/0x1b4)
[ 2945.114532] [<c00d89b4>] (handle_IRQ_event+0x9c/0x1b4) from
[<c00da5dc>] (handle_level_irq+0xdc/0x160)
[ 2945.114562] [<c00da5dc>] (handle_level_irq+0xdc/0x160) from
[<c004e088>] (asm_do_IRQ+0x88/0xc8)
[ 2945.114593] [<c004e088>] (asm_do_IRQ+0x88/0xc8) from [<c05bb128>]
(__irq_usr+0x48/0x120)
which is reported here:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-ti-omap4/+bug/690370 and
which happens during the NFS usage over ETH over USB. Also the issue
seems to be more discussed here:
http://marc.info/?t=130406641000006&r=1&w=2
http://marc.info/?t=130471082300010&r=1&w=2
but as Oliver Neukum wrote me in a private reply, this issue is still
unsolved and Ming Lei two weeks ago also noted this in the bug report
above. Now, my question is: is this really true, i.e. people with ARM
boards which are using ETH over USB are either not using NFS or while
using NFS they get kernel crash? I'm curious and hence asking since
majority of low-cost ARM boards for hobby developers are using ETH over
USB. So far I've found just board with Marvell Armada 510 and with
Tegra2 which are using some kind of sane ethernet either implemented
on-chip (Armada 510) or by PCIe hooked realtek (tegra2 in trimslice).
All other popular platforms like OMAP3/4 (Beagle/Panda boards), just to
be released ST-Ericsson Snowball, Samsung Origen (this does not provide
ETH at all, so hooking ETH to USB is the only option here) all are using
ETH over USB.
So are all those popular and low-cost boards really out of question for
building/porting free software to ARM and yet using NFS for build
directories?
Any reports of first-hand experiences with this are highly appreciated
here as I'm going to use this on my hardware decision.
Thanks a lot,
Karel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists