linux-kernel - Re: [tip:sched/locking] sched: Add p->pi_lock to task_rq

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <BANLkTi=unLFAYsm7k_4PBxJb4W7iowZMyQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Sun, 5 Jun 2011 07:50:40 +0900
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:	Arne Jansen <lists@...-jansens.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	hpa@...or.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, efault@....de,
	npiggin@...nel.dk, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	frank.rowand@...sony.com, linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [tip:sched/locking] sched: Add p->pi_lock to task_rq_lock()

On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 7:08 AM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
>
> Yeah, that wants a whole lot of reverting, from the offending commit up
> to and including 317f394160e9beb97d19a84c39b7e5eb3d7815a8.

Mind sending one single tested patch? I still get conflicts, even just
trying to revert the last of those (ie 317f394160e9) due to all the
other scheduler changes..

                   Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/