[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20110604.203828.193685667.anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp>
Date: Sat, 04 Jun 2011 20:38:28 +0900 (JST)
From: Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@....ocn.ne.jp>
To: mjt@....msk.ru
Cc: James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com, axboe@...nel.dk,
greg@...ah.com, jslaby@...e.cz, stable@...nel.org,
jejb@...isc-linux.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
wolfgang.walter@...m.de
Subject: Re: [stable] apparent regression (crash) - 2.6.38.6
On Fri, 03 Jun 2011 11:01:37 +0400, Michael Tokarev <mjt@....msk.ru> wrote:
> Something like this? (run-tested but I haven't seen the problem
> in this place)
>
> commit 2e8532e0a9ee1d25b279ac78ee8ce31701e2aa15
> Author: Michael Tokarev <mjt@....msk.ru>
> Date: Fri Jun 3 10:50:49 2011 +0400
>
> block: add proper state guards to elv_queue_empty()
Yes, that's exactly what I mean.
> Like in 0a58e077eb600d1efd7e54ad9926a75a39d7f8ae (backported to
> stable 2.6.38 as 0a58e077eb600d1efd7e54ad9926a75a39d7f8ae) which
> fixes this for __elv_next_request(), as reported by Atsushi Nemoto,
> elv_queue_empty() also needs to check for dead queue condition
> before touchin elevator.
>
> elv_queue_empty() has been removed upstream so this is only applicable
> for versions prior to 2.6.39, including 2.6.32-longterm.
Yes, Wolfgang Walter reported same crash on 2.6.32.40 so
2.6.32-longterm would need this fix.
I suppose all stable branches which have backport of 86cbfb56 ("put
stricter guards on queue dead checks") need this fix.
---
Atsushi Nemoto
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists