linux-kernel - Re: [patch] sched, cgroups: fix MIN

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1307192600.8618.3.camel@marge.simson.net>
Date:	Sat, 04 Jun 2011 15:03:20 +0200
From:	Mike Galbraith <mgalbraith@...e.de>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Nikhil Rao <ncrao@...gle.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: [patch] sched, cgroups: fix MIN_SHARES on 64 bit boxen

On Sat, 2011-06-04 at 13:24 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Sat, 2011-06-04 at 11:29 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > c8b28116 claimed to have no user-visible effect, but allows setting cpu.shares
> > to < MIN_SHARES, which the user then indeed sees.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
> > ---
> >  kernel/sched.c |    2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > Index: linux-2.6/kernel/sched.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/sched.c
> > +++ linux-2.6/kernel/sched.c
> > @@ -292,7 +292,7 @@ static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(task_group_lock);
> >   * (The default weight is 1024 - so there's no practical
> >   *  limitation from this.)
> >   */
> > -#define MIN_SHARES	2
> > +#define MIN_SHARES	(scale_load(2))
> >  #define MAX_SHARES	(1UL << (18 + SCHED_LOAD_RESOLUTION))
> >  
> >  static int root_task_group_load = ROOT_TASK_GROUP_LOAD;
> 
> Hurm, but that destroys most of the gains from that patch, the whole
> point was being able to have finer graunlarities, but now
> calc_cfs_shares() and effective_load() are clipped the coarse
> granularity.

Oh well, drink one, spill one, give one away :)

> So maybe explicitly change the MIN_SHARES usage in
> sched_group_set_shares(). That wants to become a clamp user anyway,
> something like:
> 
> shares = clamp(shares, scale_load(MIN_SHARES), scale_load(MAX_SHARES));
> 
> That way MAX_SHARES can also loose its SCHED_LOAD_RESOLUTION factor and
> bring is back in line with MIN_SHARES.

sched, cgroups: fix sched_group_set_shares() on 64 bit boxen

c8b28116 claimed to have no user-visible effect, but allows setting cpu.shares
to < MIN_SHARES, which the user then sees.

Signed-off-by: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
---
 kernel/sched.c |    9 +++------
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

Index: linux-2.6/kernel/sched.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/sched.c
+++ linux-2.6/kernel/sched.c
@@ -292,8 +292,8 @@ static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(task_group_lock);
  * (The default weight is 1024 - so there's no practical
  *  limitation from this.)
  */
-#define MIN_SHARES	2
-#define MAX_SHARES	(1UL << (18 + SCHED_LOAD_RESOLUTION))
+#define MIN_SHARES	(1UL <<  1)
+#define MAX_SHARES	(1UL << 18)
 
 static int root_task_group_load = ROOT_TASK_GROUP_LOAD;
 #endif
@@ -8439,10 +8439,7 @@ int sched_group_set_shares(struct task_g
 	if (!tg->se[0])
 		return -EINVAL;
 
-	if (shares < MIN_SHARES)
-		shares = MIN_SHARES;
-	else if (shares > MAX_SHARES)
-		shares = MAX_SHARES;
+	shares = clamp(shares, scale_load(MIN_SHARES), scale_load(MAX_SHARES));
 
 	mutex_lock(&shares_mutex);
 	if (tg->shares == shares)


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/