[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BANLkTikJJfyo-eExZYN4iZUO+RrkgPmX4A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 5 Jun 2011 16:37:40 +0200
From: Guillaume Chazarain <guichaz@...il.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>, gregkh@...e.de,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: tty breakage in X (Was: tty vs workqueue oddities)
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 11:36 AM, Linus Torvalds
<torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> Otherwise we'll need to just revert it. The commit is clearly totally broken.
Even after the revert in http://git.kernel.org/linus/55db4c6 I can
reproduce some pty oddities using the test program in
http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/2/14/212.
Instead of having the output being different from the input, the child
process hangs reading while the parent is done writing.
The hangs should be easily seen with:
$ while :; do date; yes | head -n 5000 | ./a.out > /dev/null; done
--
Guillaume
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists