lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 6 Jun 2011 10:47:20 +0200
From:	Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>
To:	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
Cc:	Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...aro.org>, arnd@...db.de,
	patches@...aro.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	kernel@...gutronix.de, olof@...om.net,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] gpio/mxc: Change gpio-mxc into an upstanding gpio
 driver

On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 02:18:29AM -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 2:12 AM, Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de> wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 01:52:41AM -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
> >> On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 12:07:55AM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> >> > The patch makes necessary changes on gpio-mxc as below to turn it
> >> > into an upstanding gpio driver.
> >> >
> >> >  * Add a list to save all mx2 ports references, so that
> >> >    mx2_gpio_irq_handler can walk through all interrupt status
> >> >    registers
> >> >
> >> >  * Use readl/writel to replace mach-specific accessors
> >> >    __raw_readl/__raw_writel
> >> >
> >> >  * Change mxc_gpio_init into mxc_gpio_probe function
> >> >
> >> >  * Move "struct mxc_gpio_port" into gpio-mxc.c, as it needs not to
> >> >    be public at all, and also make some other cleanup on
> >> >    plat-mxc/include/mach/gpio.h at the same time
> >> >
> >> > And the patch then migrates mach-imx and mach-mx5 to the updated
> >> > driver by adding corresponding platform devices.
> >> >
> >> > Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...aro.org>
> >> > Acked-by: Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>
> >>
> >> Applied, thanks.
> >
> > I'm not completely happy with this patch going through your tree. It
> > does massive changes to arch/arm/mach-*mx*, so expect merge conflicts
> > here.
> 
> There are also massive changes going on in drivers/gpio.  The solution
> here is to probably put these changes into a new dedicated branch
> based on Linus' tree, we both agree not to rebase that branch, and
> both of us merge the branch into our trees.

That can work. I just checked that atm there are no conflicts between my
branch and Shawns patches. Can you set up such a branch? Otherwise I can
just keep an eye on conflicts and we set up such a branch once a real
conflict arises.

Sascha

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ