[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110606073901.GA27075@elte.hu>
Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 09:39:01 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Andrew Lutomirski <luto@....edu>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jesper Juhl <jj@...osbits.net>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...ell.com>,
richard -rw- weinberger <richard.weinberger@...il.com>,
Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@...uu.se>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
Louis Rilling <Louis.Rilling@...labs.com>,
Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu, pageexec@...email.hu
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 8/9] x86-64: Emulate legacy vsyscalls
* Andrew Lutomirski <luto@....edu> wrote:
> > We could even 'tie down' the actual assembly by moving this all
> > to a .S - this way we protect against GCC accidentally generating
> > something dangerous in there. I suggested that before.
>
> I have no problem with that suggestion, except that once the
> current series makes it into -tip I intend to move vread_tsc and
> vread_hpet to the vDSO. So leaving them alone for now saves work,
> and they'll be more maintainable later if they're written in C.
Sure, if they move to the vDSO real soon then moving them to assembly
becomes moot.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists