| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <6D8DA3D2-D90B-4D82-BDC9-C3F0264A68BF@mit.edu> Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 09:36:41 -0400 From: Theodore Tso <tytso@....EDU> To: Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG <s.priebe@...fihost.ag> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: XFS problem in 2.6.32 On Jun 7, 2011, at 8:46 AM, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG wrote: > Hi List, > > i've massive problems with a machine using 2.6.32 kernel and XFS: I've desribed the problem here: > http://www.spinics.net/lists/xfs/msg04984.html > > The reply on the XFS mailinglist was: > http://www.spinics.net/lists/xfs/msg04994.html > > So who keeps track on which patches needs to get backported or not? And who will backport XFS fixes back to 2.6.32? An interested kernel developer. They can become interested because they personally have the time or interest, or because someone pays them to become interested. Support of the stable kernel series is not something that happens magically, or which is funded by a charity, you know. That's why some companies pay $$$ for a supported distribution kernel. -- Ted -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists