[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110607162654.GN5247@suse.de>
Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 17:26:54 +0100
From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
To: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Thomas Sattler <tsattler@....de>,
Ury Stankevich <urykhy@...il.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] mm: compaction: Abort compaction if too many pages
are isolated and caller is asynchronous
On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 12:50:29AM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> > <SNIP>
> > @@ -533,8 +544,14 @@ static int compact_zone(struct zone *zone, struct compact_control *cc)
> > unsigned long nr_migrate, nr_remaining;
> > int err;
> >
> > - if (!isolate_migratepages(zone, cc))
> > + switch (isolate_migratepages(zone, cc)) {
> > + case ISOLATE_ABORT:
>
> In this case, you change old behavior slightly.
> In old case, we return COMPACT_PARTIAL to cancel migration.
> But this patch makes to return COMPACT_SUCCESS.
> At present, return value of compact_zone is only used by __alloc_pages_direct_compact
> and it only consider COMPACT_SKIPPED so it would be not a problem.
> But I think it would be better to return COMPACT_PARTIAL instead of COMPACT_CONTINUE
> for consistency with compact_finished and right semantic for the future user of compact_zone.
>
Agreed. Thanks.
--
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists