[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4DEE6E33.6020701@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2011 20:30:11 +0200
From: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...il.com>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
CC: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] coredump: use task comm instead of (unknown)
On 06/07/2011 08:16 PM, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> On 06/07, Jiri Slaby wrote:
>>
>> @@ -1631,7 +1631,7 @@ static int cn_print_exe_file(struct core_name *cn)
>>
>> exe_file = get_mm_exe_file(current->mm);
>> if (!exe_file)
>> - return cn_printf(cn, "(unknown)");
>> + return cn_printf(cn, "%s (path unknown)", current->comm);
>
> Hmm. The patch itself looks fine to me.
>
> Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
>
>
>
> But the code looks wrong.
>
> What if d_path() fails with, say, ENAMETOOLONG? do_coredump() doesn't
> expect an error code != ENOMEM. This is just ugly, I'll send the simple
> fix. Anyway, if we are changing cn_print_exe_file(), perhaps it makes
> sense to fallback if d_path fails too?
Ah, I see. Perhaps it should check '< 0' instead of '== -ENOMEM' and
print the error in that case?
> And, I am just noticed...
>
> for (p = path; *p; p++)
> if (*p == '/')
> *p = '!';
>
> Why??? I am not arguing, just curious.
In fact the reason is in the patch 2/2:
coredump: escape / in hostname and comm
Change every occurence of / in comm and hostname to !. If the process
changes its name to contain /, the core is not dumped (if the
directory tree doesn't exist like that). The same with hostname being
something like myhost/3. Fix this behaviour by using the escape loop
used in %E. (We extract it to a separate function.)
Now both with comm == myprocess/1 and hostname == myhost/1, the core
is dumped like (kernel.core_pattern='core.%p.%e.%h):
core.2349.myprocess!1.myhost!1
thanks,
--
js
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists