[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1307480372.4204.987.camel@calx>
Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2011 15:59:32 -0500
From: Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>
To: david@...g.hm
Cc: Stratos Psomadakis <psomas@....ntua.gr>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Frank Kingswood <frank@...gswood-consulting.co.uk>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: ketchup script and 3.0
On Tue, 2011-06-07 at 13:50 -0700, david@...g.hm wrote:
> On Tue, 7 Jun 2011, Matt Mackall wrote:
>
> > But my point is that if we have adhoc transitions, we will encounter the
> > "fix all the scripts and websites" pain at every transition. And tools
> > that are managed via distros and the like can literally take years to
> > get into the hands of users. It'd be nice if the copy of ketchup shipped
> > in <enterprise distro> just worked 3 years from now because 4.0 wasn't a
> > surprise.
>
> if you special case 2.4->2.6, and make the default that 4.0 > 3.x, 5.0 >
> 4.x, etc won't things 'just work' for the forseeable future?
No, because you sometimes want to know what 2.6.39++ is and what 3.0--
is.
For instance, to upgrade from 2.6.37.2 to 3.1.2, ketchup will want to
download, cache, and apply:
patch-2.6.37.2 (reversed!)
patch-2.6.38
patch-2.6.39
patch-3.0 ?? <- hopefully Linus will make a delta against 2.6.39!
patch-3.1
patch-3.1.2
--
Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists