[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6E21E5352C11B742B20C142EB499E0480813DC6F@TK5EX14MBXC122.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 21:20:16 +0000
From: KY Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com>
To: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
CC: "gregkh@...e.de" <gregkh@...e.de>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"devel@...uxdriverproject.org" <devel@...uxdriverproject.org>,
"virtualization@...ts.osdl.org" <virtualization@...ts.osdl.org>,
Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>,
"Abhishek Kane (Mindtree Consulting PVT LTD)"
<v-abkane@...rosoft.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 49/49] Staging: hv: vmbus: Increase the timeout value in
vmbus_request_offers()
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Greg KH [mailto:greg@...ah.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2011 4:45 PM
> To: KY Srinivasan
> Cc: gregkh@...e.de; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org;
> devel@...uxdriverproject.org; virtualization@...ts.osdl.org; Haiyang Zhang;
> Abhishek Kane (Mindtree Consulting PVT LTD)
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 49/49] Staging: hv: vmbus: Increase the timeout value in
> vmbus_request_offers()
>
> On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 03:50:13PM -0700, K. Y. Srinivasan wrote:
> > Increase the timeout value in vmbus_request_offers().
>
> Why? What does this solve/fix/prevent?
On some very loaded systems, when we tested the 1 second timeout that
we had prior to this patch was insufficient. So I bumped it to 5 seconds.
Regards,
K. Y
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists