[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1106071504210.28905@asgard.lang.hm>
Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 15:05:56 -0700 (PDT)
From: david@...g.hm
To: Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG <s.priebe@...fihost.ag>
cc: Theodore Tso <tytso@....EDU>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: XFS problem in 2.6.32
On Tue, 7 Jun 2011, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG wrote:
>> whoever the maintainer of the -stable/-longterm tree is (be it an
>> individual or a team employeed by some comapny) then looks at the patch
>> and considers backporting it (if it's too hard, or to intrusive, they
>> may decide not to).
> So i have to contact Greg Kohan from SUSE directly?
if he's the maintainer of the longterm tree, then yes, you would contact
him or the stable mailing list.
>> the idea of the lonterm kernels is that organizations need to maintain a
>> kernel for a long time due to commitments that they have made (Debian
>> doesn't want to change the kernel it ships in a stable version, RedHat
>> doesn't want to change the kernel version in a RHEL release, etc), and
>> so they publicly announce this so that anyone else wanting to use the
>> same kernel version can share in the work (and therefor everyone can
>> benifit from each other's work)
> That was what i thoght. So a bug like this should get fixed right? Otherwise
> this makes no sense. Sadly Redhat has ported the fix back in his RHEL 6
> 2.6.32 kernel but they haven't send the patch to stable / vanilla team.
it depends on how intrusive/disruptive the patch is.
David Lang
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists