[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20110607160313.86fb31df.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 16:03:13 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>,
Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
<linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/15] writeback: introduce
writeback_control.inodes_cleaned
On Wed, 08 Jun 2011 05:32:39 +0800
Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com> wrote:
> The flusher works on dirty inodes in batches, and may quit prematurely
> if the batch of inodes happen to be metadata-only dirtied: in this case
> wbc->nr_to_write won't be decreased at all, which stands for "no pages
> written" but also mis-interpreted as "no progress".
>
> So introduce writeback_control.inodes_cleaned to count the inodes get
> cleaned. A non-zero value means there are some progress on writeback,
> in which case more writeback can be tried.
Yes, that makes sense. I had a workload which demonstrated/exploited
this nine years ago but I never got around to fixing it, never told
anyone and nobody noticed ;)
> + long inodes_cleaned; /* # of inodes cleaned */
nanonit: I'd call this inodes_written, because they may not actually be
clean.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists