[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110607072813.GC21263@liondog.tnic>
Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 09:28:13 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>, Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Takuya Yoshikawa <yoshikawa.takuya@....ntt.co.jp>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kvm: Fix build warnings
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 12:26:55PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> > On 05/31/2011 10:38 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > >* Borislav Petkov<bp@...en8.de> wrote:
> > >
> > >> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/paging_tmpl.h
> > >> @@ -121,7 +121,7 @@ static int FNAME(walk_addr_generic)(struct guest_walker *walker,
> > >> gva_t addr, u32 access)
> > >> {
> > >> pt_element_t pte;
> > >> - pt_element_t __user *ptep_user;
> > >> + pt_element_t __user *uninitialized_var(ptep_user);
> > >
> > >Note that doing this is actually actively dangerous for two reasons.
> > >
> > >
> >
> > <snip lots of good advice>
> >
> > > Please fix it instead.
> >
> > s/instead/in addition/; while all those changes are good, they are
> > much too large for 3.0. Let's push the simple fix for 3.0 and
> > queue the bigger refactoring to 3.1.
>
> Yeah, that's probably wise, this is a tricky function.
So, any progress on this front? Warning is still there in -rc2.
Thanks.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists