[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110608001313.GI2286@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 17:13:13 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] Fix mismatched variable in rcutree_trace.c
On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 01:43:56AM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > Hmmm... Some arches have signed CPU numbers while others have unsigned
> > CPU numbers. I do use "-1" to mean "no CPU" in some cases (for example,
> > in rcu_node_kthread_setaffinity()), so I guess for consistency I should
> > be using "int" everywhere.
>
> Do I hear that "int" is ok for you? If yes I will not revise the patch
> and please merge it. If it needs changes please let me know.
Yep, "int" is OK. I queued your patch and am testing it now.
Thank you for catching this!
Thanx, Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists