linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] dmaengine: add new dma API for max_segment

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <BANLkTi=FcNncT_6HpvB_6OnQ94f0_sz7Gw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 7 Jun 2011 23:56:21 -0700
From:	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
To:	FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>
Cc:	shawn.guo@...aro.org, linux@....linux.org.uk, patches@...aro.org,
	vinod.koul@...el.com, gregkh@...e.de, linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, cjb@...top.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] dmaengine: add new dma API for max_segment_number

On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 10:23 PM, FUJITA Tomonori
<fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp> wrote:
> On Mon, 6 Jun 2011 11:48:56 -0700
> Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com> wrote:
>
>> dmaengine expands the class of dma providers to include standalone dma
>> agents on a host bus (or elsewhere) in addition to the traditional bus
>> mastering host-bus-adapters that the existing api understands.  So in
>> the case of slave dma the dma capabilities of the block-device are
>> irrelevant because another agent will do the transfer on behalf of the
>> block-device driver.  So the value should be whatever the dma device
>> driver says it is.
>
> The dma parameter restriction could be due to software (HBA drivers,
> or subsystem). The value should be whatever the dma device driver says
> it is in such case?

I'm assuming that the dma driver is taking responsibility for setting
this correctly.  How would this work otherwise... HBA driver or
subsystem queries the dmaengine device and then sets this parameter on
its behalf?  In other words dmanengine *is* the subsystem, if I am
understanding your definition.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/