linux-kernel - [PATCH -tip v2 2/3] Add weak save_stack_trace

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 08 Jun 2011 16:09:27 +0900
From:	Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc:	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...il.com>,
	yrl.pp-manager.tt@...achi.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH -tip v2 2/3] Add weak save_stack_trace_regs()

Add weak symbol of save_stack_trace_regs() as same as
save_stack_trace_tsk() since that is not implemented
except x86 yet.

Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
---

 kernel/stacktrace.c |   13 ++++++++++---
 1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/stacktrace.c b/kernel/stacktrace.c
index eb212f8..6fa38bc 100644
--- a/kernel/stacktrace.c
+++ b/kernel/stacktrace.c
@@ -26,12 +26,19 @@ void print_stack_trace(struct stack_trace *trace, int spaces)
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(print_stack_trace);
 
 /*
- * Architectures that do not implement save_stack_trace_tsk get this
- * weak alias and a once-per-bootup warning (whenever this facility
- * is utilized - for example by procfs):
+ * Architectures that do not implement save_stack_trace_tsk or
+ * save_stack_trace_regs get this weak alias and a once-per-bootup warning
+ * (whenever this facility is utilized - for example by procfs):
  */
 __weak void
 save_stack_trace_tsk(struct task_struct *tsk, struct stack_trace *trace)
 {
 	WARN_ONCE(1, KERN_INFO "save_stack_trace_tsk() not implemented yet.\n");
 }
+
+__weak void
+save_stack_trace_regs(struct pt_regs *regs, struct stack_trace *trace)
+{
+	WARN_ONCE(1,
+		  KERN_INFO "save_stack_trace_regs() not implemented yet.\n");
+}

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/